|
A Rabbi's Reflections |
|
Home | News | Worship | Caring | Schools | Committees | Business Office | About the Temple |
|
|
|
The Value of
Life I have always found these
words compelling. Our
tradition reminds us again and again that every human life is precious.
Almost any of the mitzvot can be set aside in order to save the
precious life of another human being.
We are taught to cherish and preserve life at nearly all costs.
I believe this should apply as broadly as possible.
Ideally, we ought to strive never to take a human life, and we
should do everything we can to save the life of every human being. Throughout human and Jewish history, however, such values have come into conflict with those which affirm the right of a society to take the life of those who commit offenses worthy of capital punishment. Some rules are so important, we are told, that those who break them lose their right to life. Some societies choose to rid themselves of those who break such rules rather than bearing the cost of imprisoning or rehabilitating these individuals. True, our Torah is filled with offenses punishable by death. We are taught to put to death one who takes the life of another, one who engages in male homosexuality, one who profanes the Sabbath, a son who is defiant to his parents. . . . The list goes on and on. But it is troubling when these ancient verses, which I believe reflect a time and culture different from our own, are used by literalists to justify their own political agenda. For nearly two millennia Jewish tradition has dismissed the notion of capital punishment. For example, the rabbis and sages of the Talmud go to great lengths to demonstrate that the Torah intended to make the requirements for capital punishment so severe as to preclude it from ever being carried out. For someone to be convicted of capital murder, he must have been warned in advance that if he commits the crime he will be put to death, and his guilt must be proved by two independent witnesses giving identical testimony. Clearly, the rabbis were reluctant to enact capital punishment if there was any doubt whatsoever! At one point in the Talmud the rabbis even debate as to who is most opposed to capital punishment. Which brings us to the State of North Carolina. I would like to invite you to join me in supporting the efforts of a growing group of citizens in our state calling upon our State Legislature to enact a Moratorium on the Death Penalty. Such a moratorium would call for a temporary halt to executions in light of a growing body of evidence that the death penalty is administered unfairly. Our concern is primarily about evidence that leads to doubt as to the justice of capital punishment. What is that evidence? The Charlotte Coalition for Moratorium now tells us that: In North Carolina, black defendants who kill whites are three times more likely to face execution.
If you share my concern about this injustice, please consider writing a letter to these your state senator or representative. In particular, you might want to write to: The Honorable. . . .
Urge them to support the two year moratorium on the death penalty. In doing so, I believe we will be honoring the highest possible values of our faith. Supporting the moratorium does not require you to oppose the death penalty in every case. This moratorium simply insists that the death penalty be suspended while the courts work to eliminate doubt and injustice as much as humanly possible before we return to the debate over capital punishment. If you would like to learn more, please join us at Temple Beth El on May 1 for an evening of learning about the death penalty co-sponsored by ORT and the Temple. Our tradition and the sanctity of life call upon us to speak up for justice.James M. Bennett |
||||||||||||
|